| Container Recovery and Recycled Content |
| |
|
|
| |
| The Issue |
|
National recycling rates for aluminum, glass and plastic hover at between
30% and 40% and have been dropping in recent years. States with container
deposit legislation have much higher recycling rates averaging 78% (Michigan
boasts an impressive 95% rate).
Industry beverage leaders like Coca-Cola and Pepsi must take more responsibility
for the solid waste caused by discarded beverage containers, and move
to increase the level of recycled content in their plastic bottles.
For many years, Coke, Pepsi and the National Soft Drink Association
have fought container deposit ("bottle bill") legislation that could
lead to an increase in recycling levels.
We are working with other shareholders to encourage Coke and Pepsi
to set minimum recycled content goals for plastic beverage containers,
and to set goals for container recovery to reverse the recent slide
in recycling rates.
Coca-Cola Co.
|
|
Coca-Cola is the soft drink industry leader in the United States with
a 44% market share. Each day the company sells over 25 million plastic
soda bottles (coded #1 PET, or polyethylene terephthalate) in the U.S.
As quickly as those bottles are discarded, the company's bottlers utilize
new PET from non-renewable resources to manufacture millions of containers
each day. In a year's time, 10 billion plastic Coke bottles that contain
over 800 million pounds of virgin plastic are discarded, according to
the Grass Roots Recycling Network. While certain industries incorporate
used soda bottle plastic into a host of products, 64 percent of all
used soda bottles become waste or litter - in large part because Coke
and other beverage companies refuse to "close the loop" by taking them
back and using them again.
Recent Activity
|
|
On behalf of the Educational Foundation of America, we have been in
dialogue with the company since 1999 to increase levels of recycled
content in plastic bottles and container recovery rates.
In late 2000, we became concerned with the lack of progress by the
company and filed a resolution with our dialogue partner Walden Asset
Management asking the company to use 25% recycled content in plastic
bottles and to set an 80% container recovery goal by 2005. At the April
2001 annual meeting, the resolution received the support of received
5.2% of shares voted (88 million shares).
As a result of the resolution and our dialogues, Coca-Cola introduced
2.5% recycled content into three-quarters of its plastic beverage containers.
Subsequently, the company pledged to increase recycled content in plastic
containers from 2.5% to 10% by 2005.
We congratulate the company on the progress it has made on recycled
content and its commitment to achieve a 10% recycled content level in
North American plastic beverage containers by 2005. We are pleased by
this progress but believe a 25% level is achievable and will continue
to urge the company to set recycled content goals closer to our 25%
goal.
Multi-Stakeholder Study
|
|
The company has made less progress on the issue of container recovery.
In early 2001, a multi-stakeholder group called Businesses and Environmentalists
Allied for Recycling (BEAR) convinced Coca-Cola Co. to participate in
a study called Multi-Stakeholder Recovery Project (MSRP).
The study grew out of a desire by all parties to advance the issue
of container recovery. BEAR is a unique alliance of businesses, recyclers
and environmentalists working to maximize the recycling of beverage
containers. BEAR's goal is to double the national recycling rate of
beverage containers to 80 percent.
We have also praised the company for its willingness to be a full participant
in the MSRP. Its initial willingness to openly engage these stakeholders
was admirable and set its apart from and ahead of its competitors.
In January 2002, the MSRP group released a new analysis of the economics
of beverage container recycling system that concluded that deposit systems
result in the highest level of recovery but also have the highest gross
costs. California's container redemption law has a redemption rate of
54% and among the lowest costs identified, according to the report.
The data seem to suggest that deposit systems are much more cost effective
than Coke and other bottle bill opponents have suggested. Click here
for a link to the full text of the report.
Coke Backs Out
|
|
Coke was committed to participating in a second phase of the project
that would involve setting container recovery goals but backed out of
the project in February 2002. We have conveyed our strong disappointment
to the company over its decision to back out of the process. As a result
of this action, we intend to proceed with a shareholder resolution on
the 2002 proxy asking the company to study the feasibility of achieving
an 80% container recovery rate and 25% recycled content.
For more information on the 2002 resolution and arguments in its favor,
go to www.adrzx.com.
PepsiCo.
|
|
The Number Two soft drink maker has done far less than Coke on recycled
content and container recovery matters. The company has balked at serious
discussions with shareholder proponents. Our partners Walden Asset Management
are leading an initiative at Pepsi similar to the one we jointly lead
at Coke. The company has not been proactive in the same manner than
Coke has in actively addressing the issue.
Walden filed a resolution with Pepsi similar to the one filed with
Coke, asking that it adopt a goal to recycle at least 80 percent of
its beverage containers, and to use at least 25 percent recycled content
in beverage containers, by 2005. "Two out of every three plastic PepsiCo
containers are not recycled and this trend has worsened in recent years,"
said Kenneth Scott of Walden Asset Management, the lead proponent of
the resolution. "PepsiCo has a responsibility to assure that its products
and operations are environmentally sustainable. This resolution suggests
a benchmark by which employees, consumers and investors can measure
the company's environmental progress," said Scott.
On May 1, 2001, 8.1% of those voting (representing 83.3 million shares
worth $3.7 billion voted to support Walden's resolution.
Recent Developments
|
|
On Feb. 21, 2002, Pepsi moved away from its longstanding refusal to
use any recycled content in its plastic containers to commit to a "goal"
of 10% recycled plastic by 2005. The commitment is far less impressive
than Coke's--only U.S. sales are affected, not Canada or Puerto Rico;
only Pepsi bottles are affected, not other Pepsico beverages) but it's
a start.
Walden has filed a resolution at Pepsi for 2002, asking the company
to study the feasibility of achieving an 80% container recovery rate
and 25% recycled content.
For more information on the 2002 resolution and arguments in its favor,
go to www.adrzx.com.
|
| |
| |