Coke - Issue Analysis

Coca-Cola: Report on Setting a Comprehensive Recycling Policy

We seek your support for Item No. 4 on the 2002 Proxy Statement. This non-binding resolution asks our Board of Directors to report to shareholders on the feasibility of adopting a comprehensive beverage container recycling strategy to ensure that substantially more Coca-Cola bottles and cans are recycled.

 

 

   

Coke sells more than 100 million plastic bottles and aluminum cans of beverages every day in the United States.  An estimated two-thirds of the used plastic bottles and nearly one-half of the cans are not recycled. This is an enormous waste of raw materials. The recovery rate for PET plastic bottles, the company’s most profitable and fastest-growing beverage bottle, dropped by half in the last five years.

For more than two years, a coalition of concerned shareholders has asked Coca-Cola to set goals for recycled content and for container recovery. We are pleased with the progress made to date on recycled content but are concerned with the lack of substantive, public goals for container recovery. Thus, our resolution asks the company to study the feasibility of setting a recycling goal we believe is readily achievable—a container recovery rate of 80 percent. Please note we are asking only for a study, not a policy change. "Regrettably, Coca-Cola withdrew in February 2002 from the follow-up process to achieve consensus on a recovery program, calling into question its commitment to setting container recovery goals." please add " Click here for a summary of the report and link to the full text."

Goals are an essential element of every business activity. Without goals, Coke would founder. And so will recycling efforts. Setting substantive container recovery goals will help to reverse the decline in national recycling rates, protect Coke’s brand value, reduce risk by diversifying container feedstock sources, and allow Coke to gain competitive “first-mover” advantage.  (See accompanying fact sheet).

Container recovery is affordable, and cost-effective solutions are available. We were encouraged when Coca-Cola recently took part in a Multi-Stakeholder Recovery Project, a collaborative study with environmentalists and other businesses to document the costs and benefits of alternative recovery programs. Coke committed to also participate in a follow-up process to try to achieve consensus on a container recovery program.  Regrettably, Coca-Cola withdrew in February 2002 from the follow-up process to achieve consensus on a recovery program, calling into question its commitment to setting container recovery goals.

We are pleased that Coca-Cola maintains a leading market share of the soft drink business. But with this leadership comes responsibility. Coca-Cola has not acted decisively to address its responsibility for the solid waste crisis created by its products.  The company needs to recognize the value inherent in its used beverage containers.  It is throwing away potential revenue.

Background

   

In a year's time, 10 billion plastic Coke bottles that contain over 800 million pounds of virgin plastic are discarded. While certain industries incorporate used soda bottle plastic into a host of products, 64 percent of all used soda bottles become waste or litter - in large part because Coke and other beverage companies refuse to "close the loop" by taking them back and using them again. By using plastic bottles with little or no recycled plastic, and by opposing the very programs responsible for high recycling rates, container deposits ("bottle bills"), shareholder proponents believe Coke is leading the industry in the wrong direction. We are not necessarily asking the company to endorse container deposits. We are asking it to come up wth a program that can achieve a similar rate of container recovery.

Bottle deposit programs are the best method devised so far for collecting large amounts (80 percent) of used bottles and cans. Our CEO, Douglas Daft, has stated that "our long-term success depends on quenching the thirst of consumers each day in an environmentally sound and sustainable way." Yet Coke continues to spend millions of dollars opposing deposit laws and has not set recycling rate goals equivalent to those possible through bottle bills. Goals significantly lower than 80% would be a significant step back from what is attainable.

Our resolution was endorsed last year by the Atlanta Journal Constitution, the home-town newspaper of Coca-Cola in Atlanta. Go to the News section to view the editorial.

Coke has the marketing power, innovation and resources to fix this problem now. Please vote FOR Item No. 4 to promote strong container recovery goals. Thank you!

     
 
 

 
Home About Us News Companies Proxy Voting
 
Issue Summary
Issue Analysis
Resolution Text
Fact Sheet
Filer & Company Info
Print Report
 
For more information contact:
 
Conrad Mackerron
As You Sow Foundation
San Francisco, CA 94104
Phone: (415) 291-9867
email:
 
Ken Scott
Research Analyst
Walden Asset Management
40 Court St. .
Boston, MA 02108
Phone (617) 726-7003
 
Welcome to Proxy Information Resources

Corporate Web Template. All content on this website is © Copyright 2000-2010 - All Rights Reserved
Website template powered by VooWeb.com Corporate Web Template
The content on this site may not be reused or republished. Corporate Web Template