Home About Us News Companies Proxy Voting
 
Issue Summary
Issue Analysis
Resolution Text
Fact Sheet
Filer & Company Info
Print Report
 
For more information contact:
 
Conrad Mackerron
As You Sow Foundation
San Francisco, CA 94104
Phone: (415) 291-9867
email:
 
Ken Scott
Research Analyst
Walden Asset Management
40 Court St. .
Boston, MA 02108
Phone (617) 726-7003
 

Coke - Fact Sheet

The Problem:

  • About 114 billion beverage containers (all brands) are buried, burned, or littered annually in the United States.
  • Beverage container recycling rates have declined dramatically over the last decade. Less than 41% of all such containers are recovered for recycling in the U.S. (See Figures 1 and 2).
   
   
Figure 1: Decrease in PET Recycling Figure
2: Decrease in Aluminum Can Recycling
    Source: NAPCOR Final Report 2000 Source: Container Recycling Institute
     
   
  • Recovery of PET plastic bottles, Coca-Cola’s most profitable and fastest-growing package, has declined by half to 22.3% in the U.S. since 1995, while national production of recycled plastic PET has increased by 70%.

  • The environmental, energy and climate change impacts of this waste of resources – including 46.3 billion aluminum cans and 34.5 billion plastic bottles annually-- are enormous.

  • The overall container recovery rate is as high as it is largely because of container deposits required in 10 states. Recovery rates are two and a half times higher in states with a deposit system than in states without one.

  • Despite investing significant financial resources in opposing bottle bill legislation, Coca-Cola has not put forth a public alternative plan for increasing container recovery rates in non-deposit states to levels achieved in states with deposit laws (about 80% for containers covered by deposits).

  • The high visibility of Coca-Cola’s brand on littered packaging waste represents a brand liability.

  • Our Resolution asks the company to report to shareholders on the feasibility of achieving a recovery rate of 80% for beverage containers bottled in North America. We ask the company to perform a cost-benefit analysis of options such as curbside recycling, drop-off programs, container deposit systems and voluntary company and industry programs. We do not endorse a particular method. We leave it to the company to decide how best to achieve such a goal.

    Our Resolution Seeks to Protect Brand Value

    • Container recovery goals can reverse the decline in container recycling rates and protect the Coca-Cola brand, valued at $84 billion.

    • Increasing container recovery protects sales of the 20 oz. single-serve soft drink, the company’s most profitable product. By further closing the loop of the product life-cycle, Coca-Cola effectively protects itself from further consumer boycotts, strengthening the product’s brand value.

    Sound Risk Management

    • Diversifying container feedstock will protect bottlers against price increases of virgin plastic, which have fluctuated over time (see Figure 3).

    • Increasing recovery rates will secure supply for recycled PET, which has recently reached critically low levels, and will decrease costs of recycled PET.

    • Investing in recycled PET provides price protection and a diversification strategy to reduce risk.

    PET Price Volatility

       
       

    Figure 3: Average Historical Price of Virgin PET and Recycled PET

       
    Source: Plastics News Commodity Resin Price Index
         
       

    Gaining Competitive Advantage

    • Coca-Cola will benefit from "first-mover" advantage by increasing recovery rates before PepsiCo and other competitors, gaining access to lower priced recycled PET, and building knowledge of recovery operations.

    Cost Effective Solutions Are Currently Available

    • In the Canadian province of British Columbia, an industry-run recycling program had a 75% recovery rate in 2000 as well as an operating surplus that exceeds $5 million. Recycling can pay!

    • A new study that Coca-Cola participated in and help fund showed that significant cost savings in deposit systems are possible, for example by using reverse vending machines or a central fund to eliminate brand sorting.

    • Coca-Cola bottlers argue that recovery costs are prohibitive. However, Coca-Cola’s profits of 21 cents per container greatly exceed bottlers’ recovery costs of less than a penny.

    Your YES Vote on Item No. 4 will send a message to management to resolve the critical environmental issue of beverage container recovery.

     

    The Educational Foundation of America, Walden Asset Management and other shareholders filed this resolution. For more information, please contact: Conrad MacKerron at As You Sow Foundation (415) 291-9867, , or Kenneth Scott at Walden Asset Management (617) 726-7003, .

     
     
    Welcome to Proxy Information Resources

    Corporate Web Template. All content on this website is © Copyright 2000-2010 - All Rights Reserved
    Website template powered by VooWeb.com Corporate Web Template
    The content on this site may not be reused or republished. Corporate Web Template